November 20, 2006

Coffee and Conversation (and the sound of iron sharpening)

One of the blessings of my week is the time that I spend one-to-one with various men of the church in prayer and study. I have to confess that it is good for my soul as well as any blessing that may accrue to the men I meet and those that they subsequently help.

Currently I am meeting with three men on three early mornings, aside from regular staff meetings with Ben or admin meetings with John, our church secretary. Every one of those occasions is proving to be a joy, as we open God's Word and pray together.

If you have never considered a prayer triplet or finding a study partner, I can recommend it to you, as such occasions have been a constant blessing to me over many years.

This morning, I thought I would share a section from the first part of Jonathan Edwards' Religious Affections that I am reading with one of our men. If you have never read it, you ought to plunge in!

If anyone is orthodox on matters of theology and practice, it is Edwards - which is why I am happy to share it with you. I wonder whether you would have attributed it to him if I hadn't told you who wrote it?

"...the duty of singing praises to God seems to be appointed wholly to excite and express
religious affections. No other reason can be assigned why we should express ourselves to God in verse, rather than in prose, and do it with music but only, that such is our nature and frame, that these things have a tendency to move our affections."

Wholly to excite and express religious affections? Poetry and music are important?

How helpful Edwards can be in giving balance to our thinking!

Posted by Danny at November 20, 2006 11:19 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Edward's use of the term 'affections, particularly his use of the phrase 'tendency to move our affections' needs to be understood carefully. The doctrine of the affections, a common musical theory in the Baroque period, embraced the belief that music is capable of arousing a variety of specific emotions within a listener. Baroque theorists believed that composers could create an involuntary response in their audience. Hence, musical ideas (e.g. keys, intervals, phrase structures) became linked to specific feelings, moods and emotions and this had consequent effects on musical structures, musical development, etc. Perhaps the most famous of these was the tritone, the devil's interval, which had to be avoided at all costs by Renaissance and early Baroque composers.

Of course, many of these ideas are controversial and highly critiqued in modern musicology. Modernist notions of music being a self-contained entity which one can listen to in a purist sense has been entirely credited by postmodernist writers and theorists who place musical expression in a much wider cultural and social milieu. We bring as much with us to the music as the music brings to us.

Approaching music as a single entity, divorced from our wider lived experiences, is dangerous. It can lead to an emasculation of music's power and potential as a wonderful artform given for religious expression by divorcing it from our wider lives. We need to reconsider the role and function of music in our churches and get beyond some of these older theories and related practices. I wonder what it would sound like?

Posted by: Jonathan at November 25, 2006 10:35 AM
Post a comment













Remember personal info?